You built it with Claude. We take it to market.
Claude writes great code. But shipping a product is more than code: it's architecture decisions, edge cases, deployment, and the thousand details between "it works" and "it's live."
What breaks at scale
From chat-generated code to maintainable architecture
Code generated conversation by conversation tends to lack cohesion. We restructure it into a clean, modular codebase with consistent patterns and clear boundaries.
Edge cases, error handling, the stuff AI skips
AI gives you the happy path. Production needs graceful failures, input validation, rate limiting, and handling for the hundred scenarios that don't fit neatly into a prompt.
Deployed, monitored, ready for users
The gap between code that runs and a product that's live is wider than it looks. We handle deployment, domain setup, SSL, monitoring, and the operational layer that keeps it running.
How we work
Scope call
30-minute call. We understand what you have, what you need, and whether we are the right fit.
Spec and plan
We write a clear spec: what gets built, how long it takes, and what it costs. No surprises.
Build
We build it. You see progress daily. Working software, not slide decks.
Ship
Deployed, tested, monitored. Handed over with documentation and source code you own.
Before and after
What you have
- Code spread across chat sessions and files
- Happy-path logic with minimal error handling
- No deployment pipeline, manual copy-paste deploys
- Works in development, breaks in production
- No tests, no monitoring, no alerting
What we deliver
- Unified codebase with clear architecture
- Comprehensive error handling and input validation
- Automated CI/CD, infrastructure as code
- Production-hardened with environment parity
- Test suite, uptime monitoring, error tracking
The complete guide
What to do after building with Claude
Claude is remarkably good at writing code. You can describe a feature, get a working implementation, iterate on it through conversation, and end up with something that genuinely works. For prototyping, exploring ideas, and building initial versions of products, it is one of the best tools available.
The challenge comes when you want to ship that code to real users. Not because the code is bad (it usually is not), but because shipping a product involves decisions and work that go beyond what any single conversation can cover.
The conversation-to-codebase gap
When you build with Claude, each conversation produces focused, well-written code for the problem at hand. But a production app is not a collection of individually good solutions. It is a system where those solutions need to work together: sharing state, handling failures consistently, following the same patterns for auth, logging, and error handling.
The most common issue we see is not bad code but disconnected code. The auth module works. The data layer works. The API routes work. But they were built in separate conversations with separate contexts, and they do not form a cohesive system. Error handling is inconsistent. State management varies. Patterns that should be shared are reimplemented differently across modules.
What Claude builds well vs. what needs engineering
Claude excels at: individual components, business logic, data transformations, UI implementation, and API endpoint logic. This code is usually clean, well-typed, and correct.
What typically needs human engineering: architectural cohesion across modules, cross-cutting concerns (auth middleware, error boundaries, logging), deployment and infrastructure, performance optimization under real load, and security hardening (input validation, rate limiting, CSRF protection).
The production readiness process
We start with a code audit. We read what Claude generated, identify the architectural patterns (or lack thereof), map the security surface, and assess what is production-grade and what is not. This audit produces a clear report: green (keep as is), yellow (needs improvement), red (must rebuild).
From the audit, we write a spec for the production build. The spec covers the gaps: how modules should connect, what middleware needs to be added, how deployment works, what monitoring is needed. Then we build against that spec, keeping the good code and replacing the rest.
Timeline and cost expectations
Claude-to-production projects typically take 1 to 3 weeks and cost between 25,000 and 80,000 SEK. Claude-generated code tends to be higher quality at the component level than other AI tools, which often means less rebuilding and more integration work.
We work on fixed-price quotes. After the scope call, you get a spec with exact cost and timeline before any work begins.
For more on how AI-native development works and when it needs professional engineering, read: The AI-native workflow and Specs over code: why the spec is the product.
Frequently asked questions
How do I take my Claude-built app to production?
Start by extracting a spec from what Claude built: what the app does, the data model, the user flows. Then assess which parts are production-ready and which need engineering. Typically, the business logic and UI are solid. What needs work: architecture cohesion, error handling, deployment, and testing. We handle this entire process, from audit to deployed product.
Is Claude-generated code production-ready?
Claude generates high-quality code for individual components and functions. The gap is at the system level: how modules connect, how errors propagate, how the app handles edge cases, and how it deploys. Code generated conversation by conversation lacks the architectural cohesion that a production app needs. The code itself is often good. The system around it needs engineering.
How much does a production build cost?
Most Claude-to-production projects cost between 25,000 and 80,000 SEK. Simple apps (dashboard, CRUD, basic auth) are at the lower end. Apps with complex integrations, real-time features, or multiple user roles cost more. We quote fixed prices after a scope call. No surprises, no hourly billing.
How long does it take?
1 to 3 weeks from kickoff to deployed product. The timeline depends on complexity: a straightforward app can ship in under a week. Apps with payments, email, analytics, or complex data models take 2 to 4 weeks. You see working progress daily throughout the build.
Can I keep my existing architecture?
Usually we keep the architecture where it is sound and restructure where it is not. Claude tends to produce clean, well-structured code at the file level. The gaps are usually in how files connect to each other, shared state management, and cross-cutting concerns (logging, error handling, auth). We assess what works, keep it, and fill in the gaps.
Not sure where your project stands?
Start with a Code Audit. We review what Claude generated, assess production readiness, and give you a prioritized action plan. 5,000 SEK, 48-hour turnaround.
Get a code auditReady to take it from code to product?
30-minute scope call. We assess what Claude built, map out what's missing, and give you a fixed-price quote to ship it.